Sorry, I don't get your point about java.util.logging? You're saying using a specific logging engine (java.util.logging) is as portable and useful as using a logging api designed for the purpose? I understand that commons logging had several problems, but that's why SLF4j was designed to work around them. Is there a specific problem that you are worried about? (*Chris*)
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Jason Pyeron <jpye...@pdinc.us> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Pratt > > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 15:52 > > > > Yes, we could use Onyx's interface mechanism, but I think SLF4j's is > > probably more stable and definitely more supported. So I'd probably > > recommend that we extract the SLF4j support object and use it > > directly (or > > at least make it the default). If it's something that you're > > interested > > in, I'd have to fill out the forms to become a committer on > > Struts. Where > > would I find that information? > > (*Chris*) > > This same argument applies to java.util.logging. I strongly do not support > the > use of SLF4J in the core of the project, it is another commons debacle. If > desired, I do not see why Onyx cannot be used as a Formatter. > > -Jason > > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > - - > - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - > - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - > - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - > - - > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
