Does Weaver explicitly mean you don't need to use the others? I'm wondering about the meaning of this line:
> A: Rather than being an alternative to these technologies, Commons Weaver can be thought of as providing a structured environment in which these technologies can be put to use. I.e., the bytecode modifications made by a given Weaver implementation would typically be implemented using one of these (or comparable) libraries. Dave On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > What do think about using Apache Weaver instead of ASM, Javassist > (this requires changes in OGNL) and CGLIB (do we use it at all???)? > > https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-weaver/ > > In most cases Struts just scans classes to find annotations, this > should allow reducing dependencies > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- e: [email protected] m: 908-380-8699 s: davelnewton_skype t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton> b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/> g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton> so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
