On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: woensdag 13 januari 2010 15:53 >>> To: Hyrum K. Wright >>> Cc: Joe Swatosh; Subversion Dev >>> Subject: Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing >>> >>> I think the problem is with Neon. We get this error: >>> >>> Linking... >>> Creating library >>> ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.lib and object >>> ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.exp >>> libneon.lib(ne_socket.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol >>> _inet_aton referenced in function _ne_iaddr_parse >>> ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.dll : fatal error >>> LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals >>> >>> You are including 0.29.0 When I step it back to 0.28.3 it works. >> >> Not really about this issue as I can't reproduce that here, but: >> >> Neon versions 0.29.0-0.29.2 have a regression in connecting to several https >> servers. On sites that run a proxy or a non-apache subversion host (E.g. >> codeplex) you can see timeouts on connection close time. >> >> I would recommend sticking with 0.28.x or using 0.29.3 (Released last >> Monday) for binary releases. > > Given this feedback, and the fact that it's a patch release with supposed > minimal changes between releases, I agree we should step back to Neon 0.28.3. > I've rerolled the tarballs and replaced them at the download site with the > new deps tarballs. > > Note: All the tarballs have been recreated, as have the signatures. You'll > need to sign the new 1.6.8 tarballs, not the old ones. > > This is turning into quite the star-crossed release. Thanks for the patience. >
The deps .zip and .bz2 and .gz seem to still have neon 0.29.0.... -- Joe
