C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Mark Phippard wrote: >> 2010/1/19 C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]>: >>> Роман Донченко wrote: >>>> C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan >>>> 2010 17:57:17 +0300: >>>>> I'd be lying if I said I cared a lick about the licensing of our Python >>>>> bindings *tests*. But unless I'm mistaken, there's no reason for the >>>>> bindings themselves to carry additional copyright and license >>>>> baggage. If >>>>> that's the case, I hereby request that we drop said baggage immediately. >>>>> >>>> Well, we can't drop it entirely, we should just move into a more >>>> appropriate place (i.e. the tests/trac directory) and clarify which code >>>> it applies to. >>> Yes. It should be LICENSE_FOR_PYTHON_BINDINGS_TEST_SUITE, not >>> LICENSE_FOR_PYTHON_BINDINGS (which should have exactly the same license as >>> the rest of Subversion). >> Under the ASF system I thought we could potentially drop this entirely >> and add something to NOTICE and LICENSE in root? > > That's even better!
Is there an example of this readily available. I'm pouring over http://www.apache.org/legal/ and http://www.apache.org/licenses/ without success here. -- C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
