On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:59, Julian Foad <julianf...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>> I'd call them the Unchanged tree, the Schedule tree, and the Actual tree.
>> And just to be wild, I'd not make them all-caps ;)
>
> For the first, "Unchanged" could be OK, although since we talk about
> changes so often it might be ambiguous in more contexts than some other
> words would be. ("If the Actual version is unchanged ...", "If the
> Unchanged version has changed ...") "Original" or "Repository" or
> "Checked out" might be better. "Base" might be OK if we decide that's
> what the meaning of the user-level "Base" concept should be.I have no particular interest in ensuring the names line up, but I definitely don't want to use the same name when it means something else to our users. "Repository" is troublesome because you might be talking about the server-side trees. "Original", "Checked out", or "Pristine" seem okay. > For the second, "Schedule" is a bad idea because it has strong and > specific meanings in WC-1. Greg suggested "Restructured" which sounds > perfect. > > For the third, "Actual" is fine. Too busy to respond in depth here, but just had a thought: how about "Edits" to replace the "Actual" name? Cheers, -g
