Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 03:11:06AM +0100, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: [...] > > So anything it does with patches should be done by > > svn. In effect, whatever Tortoise wants to do with a patch has to be > > implemented in svn, taking away dev time from wc-ng, pristine store and <add > > cool features>. > > So svn patch is not a <cool feature>?
Neither of us meant that. Patch is a good thing to be doing, too. - Julian > I want to see the basics of the 'svn patch' feature through to completion > for 1.7. We have enough features that were released in a half-baked state. > > > The real question is: how much effort shall we invest at this point into > > selectively applying patches? Can it wait for a later release? Can someone > > who really needs it implement it? > > Nobody can implement anything before discussing what needs to be > implemented (which is what this thread is about). > > Stefan
