C. Michael Pilato wrote on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 at 22:02 -0000: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > You mean, to extend the dav_db structure to hold that information? If > > that's possible, I suppose the only candidate for filling in that > > information is db_open(), who can examine its dav_resource object. But > > does the dav_resource object contain the needed information? Or do we > > need the request_rec object for that? > > Hrm, come to think of it, this might be something that isn't easy to do by > merely extending the PROPPATCH request. mod_dav may simply not give us > enough information. Is this something we need to employ HTTPv2 for? (I > truly don't know at this point.)
Update: after talking to Greg and Mike on IRC, the current plan is to use db_store()'s ELEM parameter to access the PROPPATCH XML document tree, before trying other approaches (HTTPv2, POST, etc).
