On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > You truncate the author name even in 'svn blame -v' --- is that per the > previous thread's concensus too? (Personally I lean towards not > truncating with -v.)
Thanks for the feedback. I didn't consider that -v would have to be handled differently, but I see your point (verbose may imply not to drop any information for the sake of formatting). The previous thread didn't talk about "blame -v", just "blame" in general, so I thought the consensus of the thread applied to all blame output, whether -v or regular. But maybe that was not the intent. I don't really have a preference one way or the other. I never use "blame -v" from the command line (and it wasn't really my personal problem anyway, I just took it on to get some exercise in svn hacking ;). So I'll let you guys decide ... Cheers, Johan >> > [1] http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-04/0463.shtml
