Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> > wrote: > > You truncate the author name even in 'svn blame -v' --- is that per the > > previous thread's concensus too? (Personally I lean towards not > > truncating with -v.) > > Thanks for the feedback. > > I didn't consider that -v would have to be handled differently, but I > see your point (verbose may imply not to drop any information for the > sake of formatting). The previous thread didn't talk about "blame -v", > just "blame" in general, so I thought the consensus of the thread > applied to all blame output, whether -v or regular. But maybe that was > not the intent. > > I don't really have a preference one way or the other. I never use > "blame -v" from the command line (and it wasn't really my personal > problem anyway, I just took it on to get some exercise in svn hacking > ;). So I'll let you guys decide ...
In my opinion, "blame -v" is not very good for direct viewing, so I expect it is more often filtered in some way before the user views it. In the interest of solving the most likely scenario (viewing the non-verbose output neatly) without making unnecessary other changes, I vote for leaving the "blame -v" output unchanged. Done; committed in r957874, omitting the "blame -v" part. Thank you for the patches! - Julian
