Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > I suggest to create libsvn_ra_util library (similar to libsvn_fs_util). > The code of svn_ra_get_path_relative_to_root() would be moved to > svn_ra__get_path_relative_to_root(), which would be defined in libsvn_ra_util. > libsvn_ra and libsvn_ra_svn would be linked against libsvn_ra_util. > libsvn_ra_svn would use svn_ra__get_path_relative_to_root(). > svn_ra_get_path_relative_to_root() would be defined in libsvn_ra and would > wrap svn_ra__get_path_relative_to_root().
But svn_ra_get_path_relative_to_root() and svn_ra_get_path_relative_to_session() call in the RA providers. So wouldn't that make them dependent on libsvn_ra (another dependency cycle)? -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
