Do we have tests for the upgrade process? For example, upgrading text-bases from a 1.0 working copy (no revert-base!), from 1.4 working copies when revert was introduced, etc. Tests for computing missing checksums?
(that's the one thing stopping my in-db-props format bump) On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:23, Julian Foad <[email protected]> wrote: > Any objections to enabling SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE and WC format = 17 > in trunk tomorrow morning? > > Since r959358, builds with SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE defined and WC > format bumped to 17 are passing all tests in the test suite and I have > been using such a build on one of my trunk WCs today. > > What's not there yet? > > - removing unreferenced pristines from the store > > That's the main thing. That means the pristine store directory (and DB > table) will grow with each "svn update". I think that's OK to work with > during development for a short while. I'm starting to write some > cleanup code now. > > I'm looking forward to removing a lot of cruft after we enable it. > > - Julian > > >
