On Thu, 2010-07-01, Greg Stein wrote: > Do we have tests for the upgrade process? For example, upgrading > text-bases from a 1.0 working copy (no revert-base!), from 1.4 working > copies when revert was introduced, etc. Tests for computing missing > checksums?
Thanks to Bert, last night, yes we do. Now enabling it ... r959954: subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h: Enable the pristine text store: bump the WC format to 17 and define SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE. - Julian > (that's the one thing stopping my in-db-props format bump) > > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:23, Julian Foad <[email protected]> wrote: > > Any objections to enabling SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE and WC format = 17 > > in trunk tomorrow morning? > > > > Since r959358, builds with SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE defined and WC > > format bumped to 17 are passing all tests in the test suite and I have > > been using such a build on one of my trunk WCs today. > > > > What's not there yet? > > > > - removing unreferenced pristines from the store > > > > That's the main thing. That means the pristine store directory (and DB > > table) will grow with each "svn update". I think that's OK to work with > > during development for a short while. I'm starting to write some > > cleanup code now. > > > > I'm looking forward to removing a lot of cruft after we enable it. > > > > - Julian > > > > > >
