Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Wed, 7 Jul 2010 at 18:31 +0200:
> Stefan Sperling writes:
> > I'd prefer adding this as a new command, such as "svnrdump" ("remote dump").
>
> Actually, since I can never support dumpfilev2 with this tool, it
> probably doesn't make sense to plug it into `svnsync`.
I don't see the connection?
Personally, I'm worried about the more incremental aspects of svnsync:
e.g., when only half of the revisions are created via svnsync (and the
other half via emailing dump files), or when 'copy-revprops' is used,
or the ability to just swap source and target repositories (after fixing
a couple of revprops), etc. If you plug into svnsync, you have to
implement all these, or special-case them...
Daniel
(am I against putting this in svnsync? I didn't think I was when
I started this mail, but having finished I think I am)
