On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 22:51, Hyrum K. Wright > <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: >>... >> My one concern (and perhaps this comes from not following the >> discussion closely enough) is how this impacts 1.7. This feels eerily >> like an eleventh-hour redesign, and our track record with these in the > > Nope. This has been "on deck" for months, but just hasn't happened in > force until now. This schema change is required to support an add > within a copy. (along with enabling other stuff like better reverts)
Sure, but is this "bring us back to parity with 1.6" work, or is it "new stuff we can do with wc-ng" work? If the former, it's certainly a release blocker. If the latter, I'm not so sure.... -Hyrum
