"Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> writes: > Sure, but is this "bring us back to parity with 1.6" work, or is it > "new stuff we can do with wc-ng" work? If the former, it's certainly > a release blocker. If the latter, I'm not so sure....
We currently have a regression from 1.6, wc-ng cannot record the revert-base when a child of a copied directory is replaced: svn cp wc/A wc/X svn rm wc/X/f svn cp wc/g wc/X/f # 1.7 has only one row to store text-base and revert-base -- Philip
