On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 16:54, Julian Foad <julian.f...@wandisco.com> wrote: >... > Earlier today on IRC, Philip and I came to the conclusion that a copy of > a mixed-rev subtree (at least from BASE) should be all at the *same* > op_depth.
Right. This is why the original NODES table had copyfrom_rev in it -- to support copies of mixed-rev subtrees. Cheers, -g
