Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 16:54, Julian Foad <julian.f...@wandisco.com> wrote: >>... >> Earlier today on IRC, Philip and I came to the conclusion that a copy of >> a mixed-rev subtree (at least from BASE) should be all at the *same* >> op_depth. > > Right. This is why the original NODES table had copyfrom_rev in it -- > to support copies of mixed-rev subtrees.
NODES still contains the copyfrom revision, it's the revision column when op_depth > 0. -- Philip
