>> - cold cache: 1.7 is almost 50% faster than 1.6 >> 1.7: 22s >> 1.6: 42s >> >> - hot cache: 1.7 is just about on par with 1.6 (only 20% slower) >> 1.7: 0.86s >> 1.6: 0.72s >> > > What do you guys mean by "cold cache" and "hot cache"? If they mean what I > think they mean, wouldn't "hot cache" be faster that "cold cache" ?
I think they are what you think. 22 seconds is slower than < 1s, isn't it? Bye, Erik.