>> - cold cache: 1.7 is almost 50% faster than 1.6
>> 1.7: 22s
>> 1.6: 42s
>>
>> - hot cache: 1.7 is just about on par with 1.6 (only 20% slower)
>> 1.7: 0.86s
>> 1.6: 0.72s
>>
>
> What do you guys mean by "cold cache" and "hot cache"? If they mean what I 
> think they mean, wouldn't "hot cache" be faster that "cold cache" ?

I think they are what you think. 22 seconds is slower than < 1s, isn't it?

Bye,

Erik.

Reply via email to