On 10/15/2010 05:26 PM, Bob Archer wrote: >>>> - cold cache: 1.7 is almost 50% faster than 1.6 >>>> 1.7: 22s >>>> 1.6: 42s >>>> >>>> - hot cache: 1.7 is just about on par with 1.6 (only 20% slower) >>>> 1.7: 0.86s >>>> 1.6: 0.72s >>>> >>> >>> What do you guys mean by "cold cache" and "hot cache"? If they >> mean what I think they mean, wouldn't "hot cache" be faster that >> "cold cache" ? >> >> I think they are what you think. 22 seconds is slower than < 1s, >> isn't it? >> > > DOH! I missed the .86s v 22s ... it's Friday afternoon... that is my excuse.
Don't sweat it. Hey, with some luck, you're Saturday and Sunday will run slower than usual, too. I hear that works wonders on the mind. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand