C. Michael Pilato wrote on Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:11:20 -0400: > On 10/27/2010 09:41 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > > 2. Let's think about users: they have different needs for Subversion: > > just a client, client and server etc. There are different packages to > > get Subversion to be installed and running. Some comes with just a zip > > archive, others have some installation and configuration scripts. > > That's what customers looking for. > > > > 3. From my point of view, it is more important for users to explicitly > > mark packages that requires registration and email for download. > > Agreed. There's no need for our package descriptions to be anemic to the > point of uselessness. Let the descriptions state exactly what folks will be > getting (objectively -- this is not a playground for Marketing departments). > I also agree that it makes sense to note those downloads for which > "Registration is required". As a user, I'd want to know that stuff up > front, too. >
+1 to this direction. As the page stands now, the "professionally supported and certified" is just lots of words that add nothing over "maintained by". And information-freeness is Bad. > -- > C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> > CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
