On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 16:42, Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> wrote: > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:11:20 -0400: >> On 10/27/2010 09:41 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> > 2. Let's think about users: they have different needs for Subversion: >> > just a client, client and server etc. There are different packages to >> > get Subversion to be installed and running. Some comes with just a zip >> > archive, others have some installation and configuration scripts. >> > That's what customers looking for. >> > >> > 3. From my point of view, it is more important for users to explicitly >> > mark packages that requires registration and email for download. >> >> Agreed. There's no need for our package descriptions to be anemic to the >> point of uselessness. Let the descriptions state exactly what folks will be >> getting (objectively -- this is not a playground for Marketing departments). >> I also agree that it makes sense to note those downloads for which >> "Registration is required". As a user, I'd want to know that stuff up >> front, too. >> > > +1 to this direction. > I've added note to the packages that requires registration in r1028656.
-- Ivan Zhakov
