On 12/08/2010 02:00 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > Quick question to find out what people think. > > In writing the CHANGES entry for 1.7, it would be useful to be able to > compare with previous releases what has already gone into the various > patch releases, and what hasn't. That can best happen by comparing > revision numbers, but given the revision cut over when we moved to the > ASF repo, such a comparison is tedious as best. > > Does anybody have any opinion on rewriting the revision numbers in > CHANGES (assuming it could be appropriately scripted)?
I'm okay with it. There's no much gained in preserving those old revision numbers. Besides, if folks want the old numbers, they can be found in older versions of the CHANGES file, right? :-) -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
