On 08.12.2010 20:25, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 12/08/2010 02:00 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> Quick question to find out what people think. >> >> In writing the CHANGES entry for 1.7, it would be useful to be able to >> compare with previous releases what has already gone into the various >> patch releases, and what hasn't. That can best happen by comparing >> revision numbers, but given the revision cut over when we moved to the >> ASF repo, such a comparison is tedious as best. >> >> Does anybody have any opinion on rewriting the revision numbers in >> CHANGES (assuming it could be appropriately scripted)? > I'm okay with it. There's no much gained in preserving those old revision > numbers. Besides, if folks want the old numbers, they can be found in older > versions of the CHANGES file, right? :-)
If it's going to be HTML, might as well put in ViewVC links instead of just revision numbers. -- Brane
