Neil Bird wrote: > Around about 04/02/11 10:52, Stefan Fuhrmann typed ... > >> I'll give it another bash, though , if you think it's worth it. > >> > > Definitely. It contains quite a number of file access > > optimizations that should become best visible on > > "high overhead" FS like NTFS. > > It's turning out to be the PITA I expected. > > Are you recommending I backport libsvn_subr/io.c in it's entirety?
Please only attempt to back-port one functional change at a time, not all the changes in the whole file. > I'm > currently only adopting the svn_io_open_unique_file3() routine and it's > flurry of associated helper functions. That sounds fine if all the changes in that group of functions are part of a single functional change. - Julian
