No, I didn't mean it to sound harsh. I assumed that, having already captured the data in wireshark, it would be straightforward to get wireshark to decompress it or dump it to a file.
Thanks for jumping in and correcting me. Daniel Julian Foad wrote on Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:58:22 +0000: > On Wed, 2011-02-16, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Keith Palmer Jr. wrote on Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 16:26:19 -0500: > > > > > > I tried to capture the traffic with Wireshark, but it appears that > > > everything is compressed over the wire anyway... so I can't tell if > > > I'm looking at just compressed data, or compressed+encrypted data. > > > > Decompress it then? > > Daniel, I'm sure you didn't mean that to sound harsh but it does to me! > Decompressing it might be quite difficult to arrange, practically, and > it was quite reasonable for Keith to enquire here before going to that > effort. > > Thanks for your "depends on the SASL module" answer a few minutes later. > > - Julian > >
