Those names are simply to ensure we have universally unique names. There is no concrete reason to associate any semantics with them. We could have generated a UUID instead.
So: I'd say that we keep the names as-is, and leave a note to change them to s.a.o in the 2.0 timeframe (if that ever happens!). Cheers, -g On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 14:03, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > Sorry if this was previously discussed, but there at least a couple of areas > of our code still referring to subversion.tigris.org, and I was wondering > what (if anything) we plan to do about them. > > The first is our custom DAV XML namespaces. You can see these defined in > include/svn_dav.h. > > The second is our runtime configuration subsystem, which uses "Tigris.org" > as a Windows registry key. See config_file.c and config_impl.h in > libsvn_subr. > > It's quite possible (likely, even) that we've just decided to punt on these > until 2.0. But I figured I'd ask since it crossed my mind. Whatever we > decide, I'd like to ensure that the issue tracker records that decision and > milestones any actions accordingly. > > -- > C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> > CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand > >
