On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 05:13, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Those names are simply to ensure we have universally unique names. > There is no concrete reason to associate any semantics with them. We > could have generated a UUID instead. > > So: I'd say that we keep the names as-is, and leave a note to change > them to s.a.o in the 2.0 timeframe (if that ever happens!). > +1.
-- Ivan Zhakov
