On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: >>> [1] http://serf.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ >> >> Don't the tests show that trunk is slightly faster than 1.6? It seems >> like the main thing it shows is that when working with a HTTPv1 >> server, ra_serf is significantly slower than ra_neon for svn import >> (both in 1.6 and trunk). >> > I don't think that this performance degradation is related to HTTPv1 > or HTTPv2. Looking to the source code ra_serf should faster for most > operations except checkout/update/export. It seems something broken in > serf/ra_serf in John's environment.
The reason I mention HTTPv1 is that his tests only showed the problems with a 1.6 server. With a trunk server the performance of Serf and Neon were similar. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
