On 04/07/2011 08:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:19:48 -0400: >> "Remove temp APIs": I would put this at "nice to have". These APIs are >> private, so what's the penalty if they wind up in the release? > > We'd have to support them privately for the rest of the 1.7.x line, due > to private ABI compatibility? > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/125849
Ah, okay. I didn't realize that we allowed mix-and-match of patch-level-differing-only versions. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
