On 12.04.2011 18:50, Julian Foad wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 11:08 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> On 04/07/2011 08:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >>> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:19:48 -0400: >>>> "Remove temp APIs": I would put this at "nice to have". These APIs are >>>> private, so what's the penalty if they wind up in the release? >>> We'd have to support them privately for the rest of the 1.7.x line, due >>> to private ABI compatibility? >>> >>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/125849 >> Ah, okay. I didn't realize that we allowed mix-and-match of >> patch-level-differing-only versions. > Erm... AFAIK, we don't support a mis-matched set of libraries (e.g. > libsvn_client 1.7.0 + libsvn_wc 1.7.1 + ...), so it's fine to have > internal APIs that are called from a different Subversion library, and > we won't need to preserve those through 1.7.x.
Then you'd better change the version checking code in the libraries. -- Brane
