On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:44, Mark Phippard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 17:03, C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 05/23/2011 04:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >>>... >>>> All non-serf blockers should be fixed before we branch. IOW, we get as >>>> close to a release candidate as possible on trunk. (and if people want >>>> to code new features, they should HIGHLY CONSIDER doing that on a >>>> branch, for later reintegration). >>> >>> Should we, then, move the Serf issues to 1.7-consider in the tracker? >> >> If you like churning issues... sure. >> >> I'd kind of like them front-and-center for 1.7.0 queries. But whatevs... > > I think they should stay in 1.7.0 until such point that we make a > decision to change the defaut and branch without them. As long as we > intend for Serf to remain the default, and as I understand it that is > the intent, we should keep these items in 1.7.0. > > +1, personally I prefer switch back on neon before releasing alphas.
-- Ivan Zhakov
