On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:02, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On May 23, 2011 10:21 PM, "Ivan Zhakov" <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:44, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote: >>... >> > >> > I think they should stay in 1.7.0 until such point that we make a >> > decision to change the defaut and branch without them. As long as we >> > intend for Serf to remain the default, and as I understand it that is >> > the intent, we should keep these items in 1.7.0. >> > >> > >> +1, personally I prefer switch back on neon before releasing alphas. > > The stated intent has been to try and get ra_serf in people's hands. That > also means putting it into the alphas. > > You've opened issues to track the showstoppers. If they are fixed, then > we're good. > Is it makes sense to release ra_serf in alphas if there are known showstopper bugs?
-- Ivan Zhakov
