On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 01:46:50PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 13:44:03 +0300: > > Rejecting to the OP doesn't seem to be an option. (Rejecting to > > a constant address /is/ an option, but it'd be all rejections, not just > > 'bad attachment' rejections.) > > > > Seems the option we do have is to ask for some more filename extensions > > to be allowed. > > > > > > So, can we compile a list of extensions we'd like to allow on > > attachments? > > > > Bootstrapping: > > *.diff > *.patch > (extension-less) > > > > Once we have a list I'll feed it back to infra to effect the changes.
Why not just allow any name? It makes much more sense to put a restriction on size rather than names. Maintaining a list like this is unwieldy.
