Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 15:10:16 +0200: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 14:46, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 13:44:03 +0300: > >>>> Rejecting to the OP doesn't seem to be an option. (Rejecting to > >>>> a constant address /is/ an option, but it'd be all rejections, not just > >>>> 'bad attachment' rejections.) > >>>> > >>>> Seems the option we do have is to ask for some more filename extensions > >>>> to be allowed. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> So, can we compile a list of extensions we'd like to allow on > >>>> attachments? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Bootstrapping: > >>> > >>> *.diff > >>> *.patch > >>> (extension-less) > >>> > >> *.txt > > *.log > > *.dmp
*.dump (already allowed as of today) *.svndump
