On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Hyrum K Wright > <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com>wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> Does r1154023 help at all? It's fairly simple, but "feels" like the >> right place to be destroying the wc_ctx of a client context when >> disposing of the SVNClient object. The tests still pass, but I didn't >> test this specific functionality. >> >> (Even if it doesn't improve the situation, I'd like to leave it in, >> since it improves the memory situation a bit.) >> >> > Testing on Windows. Will let you know. > OK, I came up with a reliable recipe on Windows using Subclipse that produces the problem. After merging this change to the branch the problem is fixed! Assuming you nominate this for backport, please add my +1 -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
