On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:52:06AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >> Thank you for introducing subtree mergeinfo onto CHANGES. :( > > I didn't do it! svn did! > > Jokes aside, there is subtree mergeinfo in CHANGES on 1.6.x. > I don't recall this being a problem. What exactly are you worried about?
But there wasn't any yet on 1.7.x. :) (I did the prior merges to the branch root, rather than directly on CHANGES.) For 1.6.x, answering the question "when did we last merge stuff to CHANGES?" was very difficult, since the subtree mergeinfo was touched by all the subsequent bugfix merges to the branch. Not a showstopper, of course, but a bit inconvenient (and the reason I started working on the ignore-mergeinfo problem a while back). But if 1.7 solves the problem, and that's what I use for merging, I've no complaints. -Hyrum -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com/
