On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:52:06AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >>> Thank you for introducing subtree mergeinfo onto CHANGES. :( >> >> I didn't do it! svn did! >> >> Jokes aside, there is subtree mergeinfo in CHANGES on 1.6.x. >> I don't recall this being a problem. What exactly are you worried about? > > But there wasn't any yet on 1.7.x. :) (I did the prior merges to the > branch root, rather than directly on CHANGES.) > > For 1.6.x, answering the question "when did we last merge stuff to > CHANGES?" was very difficult, since the subtree mergeinfo was touched > by all the subsequent bugfix merges to the branch. Not a showstopper, > of course, but a bit inconvenient (and the reason I started working on > the ignore-mergeinfo problem a while back). > > But if 1.7 solves the problem, and that's what I use for merging, I've > no complaints.
For the record, my recent merges to 1.7.x haven't updated any mergeinfo on CHANGES, so my concerns are unfounded. -Hyrum -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com/
