On 08/25/2011 09:29 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Paul Querna --- who wrote the initial revprop packing patch (the f5 one, >> which has been reverted) --- mentions that his use case for revprop >> packing has vanished due to hardware upgrades (acquiring SSD l2arc >> disks). > > Not everybody has an SSD. > >> With that in mind, what's the fate of the (flat files -based) >> 'revprop-packing' branch? Will anyone need it by the time 1.8.0 is >> released? If not, we may forget about the branch and avoid finishing >> and reintegrating it for 1.8.0. > > I'd still like to get the branch reintegrated back to trunk. The code > is written, is there a compelling reason (other than status quo bias) > *not* to get it back to trunk?
. o O ( Because danielsh and stsp don't want to think about successor-id packing? :-) ) -- C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
