Hyrum K Wright wrote on Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:29:59 -0500: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Paul Querna --- who wrote the initial revprop packing patch (the f5 one, > > which has been reverted) --- mentions that his use case for revprop > > packing has vanished due to hardware upgrades (acquiring SSD l2arc > > disks). > > Not everybody has an SSD. > > > With that in mind, what's the fate of the (flat files -based) > > 'revprop-packing' branch? Will anyone need it by the time 1.8.0 is > > released? If not, we may forget about the branch and avoid finishing > > and reintegrating it for 1.8.0. > > I'd still like to get the branch reintegrated back to trunk. The code > is written, is there a compelling reason (other than status quo bias) > *not* to get it back to trunk?
Works for me.
