On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 13:41, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:06:40AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:43:29PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> > I'll try to tweak my proposal such that successor ID updates become >> > transactional and happen as part of every commit. >> >> Here's a first shot at this. Comments welcome. > > FSFS gurus: > > Are any of you looking at this? > Do you think this is worth writing a prototype implementation for? > > I have so far only received feedback from danielsh. This makes me very > happy but if anyone with a couple more years of FSFS experience under > their belt could comment I would be even happier. > I'm not FSFS guru, but I still feel that FSFS successor ID doesn't worth to be implemented because there is no strong reasons/usage for it. For me it looks like bottom-up design approach.
-- Ivan Zhakov
