On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 01:57:51PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > No, I think that auto-resolving tree-conflicts involving moves is most > important task for Subversion 1.8. But I feel it could be implemented > without implementing FSFS successor ID storage. It seems that > algorithm that you posted could be reversed.
I have caused some confusion here, sorry. Contrary to how I initially presented it, That algorithm has *nothing* to do with successor IDs. Please see this post where I corrected my mistake: http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-08/0624.shtml > Anyway we can implement top-level part of handling moves and then > optimize it using FSFS successor ID storage or something else. We need the bottom parts first. It won't perform well enough without successor-IDs.
