On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 03:30:45PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> The revision works as intended for new repositories.  But for
> repositories where the predecessor count on "/" is already wrong, the
> error doesn't fix itself...
> 
> If /@50's predecessor is /@20, then /@50's pred-count is 21; but /@51's
> pred-count would be 22, not 51.
> 
> I'm working on a different fix that doesn't have this problem: checking
> if 50 - 21 == 51 - 22, and erroring out if that's not the case.

I see. Should we reverse-merge r1186144 from 1.7.x until you have
the fix or will it be done soon (as in, today)?

Reply via email to