Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 15:40:30 +0200: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 03:30:45PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > The revision works as intended for new repositories. But for > > repositories where the predecessor count on "/" is already wrong, the > > error doesn't fix itself... > > > > If /@50's predecessor is /@20, then /@50's pred-count is 21; but /@51's > > pred-count would be 22, not 51. > > > > I'm working on a different fix that doesn't have this problem: checking > > if 50 - 21 == 51 - 22, and erroring out if that's not the case. > > I see. Should we reverse-merge r1186144 from 1.7.x until you have > the fix or will it be done soon (as in, today)?
r1186231
