Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:46:14 +0100: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:04:55AM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011, at 18:37, Vincent Batts wrote: > > > I will start by working on all of the 'E' errors in the ruby tests > > > straight. I primarily want to see these ruby bindings back into the main > > > bundle of bindings, now that many distributions are defaulting to ruby > > > 1.9.x. Arch linux has followed upstream suite and shipped a subversion > > > without ruby bindings. > > > > > > Should I send a separate patch, or amend the previous? > > > > Please don't send interdiffs; but send patches against trunk@HEAD. > > > > Please send separate patches for separate functional changes. Getting > > the tests to pass with ruby1.8 would be a separate functional change than > > supporting ruby1.9. > > The tests are passing for me locally with ruby 1.8. > I would suspect some local problem at Vincent's side is preventing them > from passing.
Could be either a local build problem on Vincent's side or a bug in the testsuite causing it to fail in Vincent's environment; and in the latter case we'd appreciate a patch.