dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow plaintext passwords again. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow plaintext passwords again. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow plaintext passwords again. Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow plaintext passwords again. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow plaintext passwords again. Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow plaintext passwords again. Nathan Hartman
  • [VOTE] Reverting r1845377 (Was: [PROPOSAL] Allow plaintext passwords again.) Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: [VOTE] Reverting r1845377 (Was: [PROPOSAL] Allow plaintext passwords again.) Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: [VOTE] Reverting r1845377 (Was: [PROPOSAL] Allow plaintext passwords again.) Branko Čibej
  • Re: [VOTE] Reverting r1845377 (Was: [PROPOSAL] Allow plaintext passwords again.) Branko Čibej
  • Re: [VOTE] Reverting r1845377 (Was: [PROPOSAL] Allow plaintext passwords again.) Mark Phippard
  • Re: [VOTE] Reverting r1845377 (Was: [PROPOSAL] Allow plaintext passwords again.) Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A strong WTF on compiling out plaintext password support by default?! Bernard Boudet
  • Re: A strong WTF on compiling out plaintext password support by default?! Karl Fogel
  • Re: A strong WTF on compiling out plaintext password support by default?! Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A strong WTF on compiling out plaintext password support by default?! Daniel Sahlberg
  • Subversion on Solaris (was Re: A strong WTF on compiling out plaintext password support by default?!) Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Subversion on Solaris (was Re: A strong WTF on compiling out plaintext password support by default?!) Johan Corveleyn
• Re: svn commit: r1892471 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_client/conflicts.c libsvn_wc/wc_db.c tests/cmdline/merge_tree_conflict_tests.py Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: svn commit: r1892471 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_client/conflicts.c libsvn_wc/wc_db.c tests/cmdline/merge_tree_conflict_tests.py Stefan Sperling
  • Re: svn commit: r1892471 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_client/conflicts.c libsvn_wc/wc_db.c tests/cmdline/merge_tree_conflict_tests.py Daniel Sahlberg
• Custom prefix --with-serf and --with-zlib are handled wrong Alexandr Miloslavskiy
• [NOTICE] - Moving and Upgrading of Buildbot Jobs Gavin McDonald
  • Re: [NOTICE] - Moving and Upgrading of Buildbot Jobs Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: [NOTICE] - Moving and Upgrading of Buildbot Jobs Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: [NOTICE] - Moving and Upgrading of Buildbot Jobs Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: [NOTICE] - Moving and Upgrading of Buildbot Jobs Gavin McDonald
• Build nodes disconnected. New ones welcome. Gavin McDonald
  • Re: Build nodes disconnected. New ones welcome. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Build nodes disconnected. New ones welcome. Daniel Shahaf
• Re: svn commit: r1892176 - /subversion/site/staging/.htaccess Daniel Sahlberg
• Synology package Michael Jennings
  • Re: Synology package Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Synology package Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Synology package Michael Jennings
  • Re: Synology package Nathan Hartman
• [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 invalid xml file produced by svn log --xml -g --search Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: [PATCH] Issue #4711 invalid xml file produced by svn log --xml -g --search Daniel Sahlberg
• https by default for subversion.apache.org Daniel Sahlberg
• Incorrect filenames when checking out under Windows Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Incorrect filenames when checking out under Windows Daniel Shahaf
• Re: svn commit: r1891998 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: svn commit: r1891998 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: svn commit: r1891998 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Daniel Sahlberg
• Re: svn authz error: Access denied issue when running svn rm resource where the user should be able to have full access Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: svn authz error: Access denied issue when running svn rm resource where the user should be able to have full access Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: svn authz error: Access denied issue when running svn rm resource where the user should be able to have full access Andrei Cusnir
• A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. C. Michael Pilato
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Stefan Sperling
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Stefan Sperling
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Branko Čibej
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Branko Čibej
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Lorenz
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Branko Čibej
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • The pristineless-hack branch (was: Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.) Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Ivan Zhakov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf

• Earlier messages
• Later messages