Branko Čibej wrote on Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 14:18:50 +0100:
> On 18.03.2012 12:52, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Роман Донченко wrote on Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 15:36:24 +0400:
> >> Daniel Shahaf <danie...@elego.de> писал в своём письме Sun, 18 Mar
> >> 2012 04:07:45 +0400:
> >>
> >>> [[[
> >>> Index: subversion/bindings/swig/python/svn/fs.py
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> --- subversion/bindings/swig/python/svn/fs.py (revision 1301511)
> >>> +++ subversion/bindings/swig/python/svn/fs.py (working copy)
> >>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ from libsvn.fs import *
> >>> from svn.core import _unprefix_names, Pool
> >>> _unprefix_names(locals(), 'svn_fs_')
> >>> _unprefix_names(locals(), 'SVN_FS_')
> >>> +__all__ = filter(lambda x: x.lower().startswith('svn_'),
> >>> locals().keys())
> >>> del _unprefix_names
> >>> ]]]
> >>>
> >>> Before:
> >>> % python -c 'from svn.fs import *;
> >>> print [x for x in locals().keys() if "begin_txn2" in x]'
> >>> ['svn_fs_begin_txn2', 'begin_txn2']
> >>>
> >>> After:
> >>> % python -c 'from svn.fs import *;
> >>> print [x for x in locals().keys() if "begin_txn2" in x]'
> >>> ['svn_fs_begin_txn2']
> >>>
> >> This would nullify the purpose of _unprefix_names, would it not?
> >>
> > No. It enables this code:
> >
> > from svn.fs import *
> > svn_fs_begin_txn2()
>
> The only trouble with this "new way" as opposed to the "old way" is that
> it's not the "Python way" :)
>
The patch doesn't break things for those who use the svn.fs.begin_txn2()
way. Those who don't use star-imports will not be affected by it.
> -- Brane
>
