On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:06 AM, <cmpil...@apache.org> wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c Tue May 8 15:06:18 2012
>...
> +/* Implements svn_stream_stream_fn_t */
> +svn_error_t *
> +svn_stream_lazyopen_create(svn_stream_t **stream,
> + svn_stream_lazyopen_func_t open_func,
> + void *open_baton,
> + apr_pool_t *result_pool)
Implements what?! That comment seems like a copy/paste-o.
> +{
> + lazyopen_baton_t *lob = apr_pcalloc(result_pool, sizeof(*lob));
> +
> + lob->open_func = open_func;
> + lob->open_baton = open_baton;
> + lob->real_stream = NULL;
> + lob->pool = result_pool;
> +
> + *stream = svn_stream_create(lob, result_pool);
> + svn_stream_set_read(*stream, read_handler_lazyopen);
> + svn_stream_set_skip(*stream, skip_handler_lazyopen);
> + svn_stream_set_write(*stream, write_handler_lazyopen);
> + svn_stream_set_close(*stream, close_handler_lazyopen);
> + svn_stream_set_mark(*stream, mark_handler_lazyopen);
> + svn_stream_set_seek(*stream, seek_handler_lazyopen);
> +
> + return SVN_NO_ERROR;
> +}
Per my suggestion on IRC, I don't see how this function can ever
error, or ever need a scratch_pool (no matter how we might
extend/upgrade it). I'd suggest updating the signature accordingly.
Cheers,
-g
