Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:13:16 -0700: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> wrote: > > Philip Martin wrote on Wed, May 16, 2012 at 18:39:37 +0100: > >> The issue that worries me the most is the traffic issue: > >> > >> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3980 > > > > Your recent figures on that issue show a +122% increase in traffic. Do > > we know what the worst case increase is? For example, does ra_serf > > always require up to x% more traffic than ra_neon (for fixed x)? > > Looking at network traces from a current build, I don't think the > PROPFIND issue Greg identified in the issue has been resolved > yet...though I know there has been discussion on-list about it > recently. A ~20% increase in traffic is quite likely due to that -
Perhaps I wasn't clear. The traffic using ra_serf is 2.2 times as much as using ra_neon; see the (currently) last comment on the issue Philip links to.
