On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps I wasn't clear. The traffic using ra_serf is 2.2 times as much > as using ra_neon; see the (currently) last comment on the issue Philip > links to.
I definitely don't see that locally - I only see about a 20-25% gap - which from looking at the traces appears to generally be due to the extra PROPFIND requests. Here's what I see for a checkout of svn trunk - http(s)://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk Neon (HTTP): 17294674 bytes Neon (HTTPS): 17543641 bytes Serf (HTTP): 21892977 bytes Serf (HTTPS): 19399160 bytes The reason HTTPS for ra_serf is smaller is that Serf and OpenSSL is a pretty optimized path based on network packets... -- justin
