Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Sat, May 19, 2012 at 07:39:59 -0700: > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ewww. You are evil. Go away, and come back when you are less evil. > >> > >> Just kidding. But seriously ... evil. > > > > So why won't Ivan's idea work? > > > > (I assume it won't work, but now that it's been aired it would be nice > > to hear from an ra_serf person _why_ it won't work.) > > Short answer: neon is a synchronous library while serf is an > asynchronous library. The internal paradigms for ra_serf and ra_neon > are completely different due to that. I wouldn't even want to think > about trying to shoehorn one on top of the other...it's just evil. =)
Well, we could have a single ra_dav library with a backend_supports_synchronity bitfield. In theory, at least. > -- justin
